In what situation might a representative withdraw from assisting a claimant?

A representative may withdraw from assisting a claimant when the claimant refuses to cooperate. This situation is critical because effective communication and collaboration between the claimant and the representative are essential for the proper handling of a case. If the claimant is not providing necessary information, attending required meetings, or otherwise engaging with the process, the representative's ability to advocate effectively diminishes significantly.

In this case, the withdrawal is a necessary step to ensure that the representative can maintain their professional standards and ethical obligations, including the duty to represent their clients to the best of their abilities. A breakdown in cooperation can lead to complications that may negatively affect the outcome of the claim, making it impractical or impossible for the representative to continue their role effectively.

The other scenarios do not typically provide reasonable grounds for withdrawal. Winning a case does not eliminate the need for representation, ongoing claims require support, and a representative cannot arbitrarily withdraw without a valid reason beyond simply being requested by the claimant.