Under what conditions might Bob be able to request a reopening of his case?

The option indicating that Bob can request a reopening of his case within 12 months of the initial denial accurately reflects the time frame established by various regulatory guidelines. Typically, claimants are afforded a specific time period to appeal or request a reopening, which is often set at one year from the date of the initial decision. This timeline ensures that claims are handled efficiently, allowing for timely resolutions while also providing fairness to applicants.

The precise wording highlights the importance of adhering to the deadlines established for reopening cases. If Bob attempts to request a reopening after this 12-month period, he may be met with complications or outright denials based solely on the lapse of time. This aspect of procedural regulation emphasizes the necessity for claimants to act promptly within the allowed period, underscoring why this option is the correct response.

Other choices either misinterpret the timeframe or create conditions that could lead to misunderstanding. For example, mentioning a one-year period without the specific emphasis on "within" fails to clarify the importance of the timeline, while limiting requests purely to new medical evidence excludes other valid grounds for reopening a case, such as changes in circumstances or additional evidence that may not be medical in nature.