Which of the following is not a valid reason for filing a fee petition?

Filing a fee petition typically requires justifications that align with the work performed and the results achieved throughout a case. When it comes to reasons for submitting a fee petition, valid factors usually include time and effort invested, the complexity of the case, and the outcomes that resulted from the work done.

Time spent on the case is a critical metric in assessing the amount of work invested by the attorney or representative, thus making it a valid reason for a fee petition. Similarly, working with the claimant for an extended period highlights the representative's commitment and the effort involved, which can also justify a fee request. Favorable outcomes from hearings indicate that the efforts put forth have resulted in positive results for the claimant, further substantiating the need for compensation for services rendered.

In contrast, the denial of a claim does not provide a basis for a fee petition. A denial indicates that the efforts did not lead to a successful outcome, and therefore, it does not justify charging a fee. It illustrates that the work may not have produced the expected results, rendering this option invalid as a reason for filing a fee petition.